Tag: U.S. Fifth Circuit Court
-
Maritime Casualty
Seamen’s Recovery of Punitive Damages Against Non-Employer Third Parties
- April 25, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
We previously reported on the dispute whether Jones Act seamen can recover punitive damages under general maritime law against non-employer third parties. District court opinions on this issue have differed, mostly due to conflicting interpretations of prior U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decisions. Hume v. Consolidated Grain & Barge, […]
-
Maritime Casualty
Fifth Circuit: LOIA Applies to Agreement to Salvage Platform
- April 6, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
LOIA Voids Certain Oilfield Indemnity Provisions Louisiana’s Oilfield Indemnity Act (“LOIA”) may invalidate certain indemnity agreements in oilfield contracts. See La. R.S. 9:2780. There is a two-part test to determine if LOIA applies: (1) the agreement must pertain to an oil, gas, or water well, and (2) the contract must involve operations related to the […]
-
Business Litigation
Fifth Circuit Issues Warning for Lenders Seeking to Accelerate Loans in Default
- April 4, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
Recent case assesses when the statute of limitations/prescriptive period begins to run. There is an important warning for creditors hidden in dicta of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent ruling, Martin v. Federal National Mortgage Association, No. 15-41104 (5th Cir. Feb. 22, 2016) – accepting payment after accelerating a debt could waive the acceleration […]
-
Employment Law & Litigation
Bad Faith Claims in Mississippi Could Affect Other Jurisdictions
- March 30, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
Mississippi Bad Faith Claims Can Affect Employers and Carriers in Other jurisdictions With companies operating in multiple states, navigating interstate laws has become increasingly tricky. This is especially true in the worker’s compensation arena where an employer can be sued for benefits in its state of operation, the state where the injury occurred, or the […]
-
Maritime Casualty
Seamen May Be Exempt from FLSA Overtime Rules
- March 28, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
Overtime Rules Under the FLSA The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) requires that some employees be paid at least “one and one-half times” their regular wages for time worked over 40 hours in a workweek. 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1). However, the FLSA has an exemption for employees who are classified as “seamen.” 29 U.S.C. § […]
-
Maritime Casualty
What Are Vessel “Appurtenances”?
- March 14, 2016
- By Alan Stewart
Maritime cases often discuss vessels and their “appurtenances.” For example, a vessel owner can be held liable under the theory of unseaworthiness if the vessel’s appurtenances are defective. Merriam-Webster defines “appurtenance” as “an object that is used with or for something.” But what does the word mean under general maritime law, and how do we […]
-
Employment Law & Litigation
Title VII Pregnancy Bias Claim Requires More than Temporal Proximity
- February 15, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision in Fairchild v. All American Check Cashing, Inc. that the employer had not violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Fairchild v. All American Check Cashing, […]
-
Insurance & Casualty Litigation
Statutorily Limiting Liability in Certain Vessel Lawsuits
- January 27, 2016
- By Alan Stewart
Under the federal Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 (“the Act”), owners of vessels (and, occasionally, charterers of vessels) can sometimes limit their exposure in vessel-related cases to “the value of the vessel and pending freight.” See 46 U.S.C. §§ 30501 et seq. If a vessel has multiple owners, any owner’s liability will not exceed […]
-
Maritime Casualty
Recovery of Punitive Damages by Seamen in the Eastern District of Louisiana
- January 11, 2016
- By Allen & Gooch
The availability of punitive damages for seamen has historically been a murky issue. District courts are still attempting to decipher U.S. Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit jurisprudence to determine when punitive damages are available under the Jones Act and general maritime law. Judges and jurists first look to the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in […]
-
Maritime Casualty
Employers Not Entitled To Restitution Of Maintenance And Cure Benefits
- June 3, 2013
- By Allen & Gooch
The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently released an opinion concerning a maritime employer’s obligation to pay maintenance and cure benefits. In Boudreaux v. Transocean Deepwater, Inc., 711 F.3d 501 (5th Cir. 2013), the Court tackled what it called a “novel” issue: whether a successful McCorpen defense automatically entitles an employer to restitution of maintenance and cure benefits […]